HAM DNA ProjectHAM Surname DNA Project

Research through Genetics



Contact Locations Become a Contact Alabama Contacts Georgia Contacts Illinois Contacts Indiana Contacts Kansas Contacts Kentucky Contacts Missouri Contacts North Carolina Contacts New Hampshire South Carolina Contacts Tennessee Contacts Virginia Contacts England Contacts Contact HAM Country
All Locations General Links HAM web pages Kentucky North Carolina Tennessee Virginia West Virginia Belgium France Britain (England) Netherlands Scotland
Submit a new Query All Locations Alabama Arkansas Georgia Iowa Illinois Kentucky Louisiana Minnesota Missouri Mississippi North Carolina New York Ohio Oklahoma South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia Canada (NB) England France
All Estates Kentucky Estates North Carolina Estates Tennessee Estates Virginia Estates England Estates France Estates
Welcome DNA Project DNA Project Goals Intro to DNA Testing Participation Post DNA to HAM Country Privacy Statement Release of Liability Y-DNA Results Results at FTDNA Dean McGee's Output HAM DNA Phylograms Participating Families HAM Group01 Y-Search HAM Group02 Y-Search HAM Group04 Y-Search HAM Group07 Y-Search ft2dna program ft2phy program DNA Links DNA Tools

Share


Group Contact information for the HAM Surname DNA Project Participants


    DISCLAIMER:   The HAM DNA Project claims no responsibility for documentation of the lines presented here.
                                  Contact individuals listed here for more information.
HAM DNA Project Release of Liability
Contact the HAM DNA Project at HAM Country


Group 023

Group #23 has tested out by the FTDNA as
"R (M269)"

 
"Adam" -> R-M207 -> R-M173 -> R-M343 -> R-L754 -> R-L389 -> R-P297 -> R-M269 -> R-L23 -> R-L51 -> R-P310 -> R-L151 -> R-P312 -> R-Z290 ->  R-L21  -> R-S552 -> R-DF13 -> R-Z39589 -> R-S1051 -> R-FGC14901 -> R-FGC64558 -> R-FT62524 -> R-FTC80997
                      

  

NOTE:

    Haplotype Groups were re-classified by Family Tree DNA in March, 2011. 
This affected the following existing groups:


    R1b1b2 became    R1b1a2
    I2b          became     I2b1

    Haplotype Groups were re-classified by Family Tree DNA in May, 2008. 
This affected the following existing groups:


    R1b1c became    R1b1b2
    I1a       became     I1
    I1b       became     I
    I1c       became     I2b
    E3b1a  became   E1b1b1


Kit number
Contact
Ancestor / Description
981xxx
Participant:
 

SE Hamm

contact email:

Malcolm Holcombe
themgholcombe(at)yahoo.com

descends from:

Leonard Ham(m) (1801 - SC | 1870 - TX) whose son is Patrick Ham (1836 - AL | 1874 - TX).  Allegedly, his father was also named Leonard.
 Leonard Ham was also in AL & FL.
 

Message:
He is a dead-end on my tree at the moment.  I'm talking to a Male Ham Cousin to see if he is willing to take a Y-DNA test.  Checking here just in case this name is familiar to anyone in this group.


995xxx
Participant:

D W Ham



contact email:

Malcolm Holcombe
themgholcombe(at)yahoo.com
descends from:

Leonard Ham  b. ABT 1801 in Orangeburg, SC, d. BTW 1860/70 likely in Polk County, TX AL or FL
married Mary Ham, b. ABT 1809 in SC, d. ABT 1836/39 in AL
3 sons:
   William J Ham, b. ABT 1833 in Henry County, AL, d. 1895 in Knoxville, Knox County, TN
   married Clarissa McDaniel, b. 1838 in GA, d. 1928 in Jackson County, FL
   Jesse Ham, b. ABT 1835 in Henry County, AL, d. UNKNOWN
   Patrick Ham, b. 1836 in Henry County, AL, d. 1874 in Polk County, TX
    married Louisa Loper, b. 1839 in Washington County, AL, d. 1887 in San Jacinto County, TX
      son:
      William Hugh Ham, b. 1871 in Polk County, TX, d. 1968 in Walker County, TX

Note:

Malcolm's mother believes Leonard Ham's lineage immigrated from Germany to South Carolina sometime in the early to mid-1700's, eventually settling in Orangeburg, SC in the latter half of the century. 

However, she also notes that German migrations may have landed in VA or NC (or Carolina) first.

Our line via Leonard Ham moved to Alabama from Orangeburg, SC.  That is about the earliest information I have. The only lead I have on him at the moment, with all the right family names, is the will of Thomas Ham, d. abt. 1829 in Pike County, AL. his will indicates a son-in-law named Leonard Ham. Misspelled names aside, his daughter was named Mary Ham-which would suggest she may have been a cousin of some distance to her husband.  In addition, Thomas willed two parcels of land in Orangeburg, SC suggesting he lived there before moving to Pike county, AL.

Thomas also named two sons, William and Jesse as administrators.  Grandchildren names, indicate he may have had another son who predeceased him but not identified. It was not a well written will, as if he wrote it himself, as there is no formal context between his three named children and his grandchildren.
  

Participant:
descends from: